12 Angry Men Analysis Essay

Published: 2020-04-22 08:26:25
450 words
2 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Literature

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
The movie Twelve Angry Men is a film about twelve jurors in a murder trial deliberating the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. All of the jurors come from very different backgrounds and see things in very different perspectives. This essay will be analyzing the group discussion that was dramatized in the film. The issues that will be brought up in this essay are leadership, participation, climate, conflict, and argumentation. One of the leadership theories that is used in this film is the styles theory. The Styles Theory of Leadership examines a collection of specific behaviors that constitute three distinct leadership styles: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. In the beginning of the movie all of the jurors were going to vote the defendant guilty expect for Juror #8. He was the only one of the jurors that wasnt in a rush to go home and go about their business. In his opinion they shouldnt send a man to jail without discussing it first. This is an example of a laissez-faire leader. He was laid back and didnt demand to be the leader or to control anyone.

He simply asked that they share why they beilieed the defendant was guilty. He then asked them to loisten to what he had to say and if they still didnt believe that there was reasonable doubt he would vote guilty so that they could all go home because that is what they wanted. Although he is the odd one out it is clear to the viewer that he is the leader of the jury not the Forman. By the end of the film he had convinced all of the jurors to believe that there was reasonable doubt and that the defendant was not guilty. Trait theory was another theoretical approach that was used in the film by Juror #8.

Read Also: Good Analytical Essay Topics

He possessed a few leadership traits that persuaded some of the other jurors to listen to him. Juror #8 was intelligent, respectful, open-minded, calm, and had good listening skills. At the begioing of the film everyone was yelling at him and telling him that he was crazy. He didnt fight back or get angry he stayed calm. He just wanted everyone to hear him out and have a discussion before acquitting a possibly innocent man. Juror #8 listened to what everyone had to say and brought up different ways that the evidence could have been wrong. He didnt force or peer pressure anyone to change thier vote, but he had such compelling arguments that everyone came to the realization that there was a possibility that the defendant did not kill his father.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read