He simply asked that they share why they beilieed the defendant was guilty. He then asked them to loisten to what he had to say and if they still didnt believe that there was reasonable doubt he would vote guilty so that they could all go home because that is what they wanted. Although he is the odd one out it is clear to the viewer that he is the leader of the jury not the Forman. By the end of the film he had convinced all of the jurors to believe that there was reasonable doubt and that the defendant was not guilty. Trait theory was another theoretical approach that was used in the film by Juror #8.
Read Also: Good Analytical Essay Topics
He possessed a few leadership traits that persuaded some of the other jurors to listen to him. Juror #8 was intelligent, respectful, open-minded, calm, and had good listening skills. At the begioing of the film everyone was yelling at him and telling him that he was crazy. He didnt fight back or get angry he stayed calm. He just wanted everyone to hear him out and have a discussion before acquitting a possibly innocent man. Juror #8 listened to what everyone had to say and brought up different ways that the evidence could have been wrong. He didnt force or peer pressure anyone to change thier vote, but he had such compelling arguments that everyone came to the realization that there was a possibility that the defendant did not kill his father.